LLMaoLLMao

    AI search visibility report · 2026-06-03

    How AI assistants see survey-monkey.com

    survey-monkey.com has an AI visibility score of 43/100. The site passed 12 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Content Structure. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Schema.org Markup.

    How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read survey-monkey.com

    Readability35/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    Content is highly complex with very long sentences, making it difficult for simple extraction.

    Schema.org Markup0/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 5 tests passed.

    Complete absence of JSON-LD structured data.

    Authority & Trust Signals30/100

    Result: weak. 1 of 5 tests passed.

    Strong trust pages (Privacy/Terms) but lacks verifiable contact details and publication dates.

    Citation & Source Quality57/100

    Result: weak. 1 of 4 tests passed.

    High volume of internal/navigational links but lacks citations to authoritative third-party data.

    Content Freshness0/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    No visible publication or modification dates found in metadata or text.

    Content Structure71/100

    Result: average. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent heading hierarchy and semantic HTML usage. Organization is clear.

    Entity Definition58/100

    Result: weak. 2 of 4 tests passed.

    Clear brand consistency and About page, but lacks Person/Author schema.

    Technical Accessibility95/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent technical setup with meta descriptions and social tags. Content is JS-independent.

    How survey-monkey.com can improve its AI visibility

    • Deploy Comprehensive JSON-LD Schema (high priority)
    • Improve Contact Transparency (high priority)
    • Expose Content Modification Dates (medium priority)
    • Optimize Sentence Complexity for LLM Parsing (medium priority)
    • Strengthen External Authority Citations (medium priority)

    How survey-monkey.com compares to its competitors