LLMaoLLMao

    AI search visibility report · 2026-10-26

    How AI assistants see qualified.com

    qualified.com has an AI visibility score of 47/100. The site passed 14 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Schema.org Markup. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Citation & Source Quality.

    How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read qualified.com

    Readability30/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    Extremely long sentences and low readability scores hinder LLM comprehension.

    Schema.org Markup74/100

    Result: average. 4 of 5 tests passed.

    Valid JSON-LD present but limited to SoftwareApplication; lacks content-specific schemas.

    Authority & Trust Signals32/100

    Result: weak. 1 of 5 tests passed.

    Strong trust pages but lacks specific author credentials and contact details like a physical address.

    Citation & Source Quality17/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    Lacks authoritative outbound links and inline citations for factual claims.

    Content Freshness0/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    No visible or machine-readable dates found on the homepage.

    Content Structure71/100

    Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    Good paragraph structure but has skipped heading levels and weak semantic HTML.

    Entity Definition43/100

    Result: weak. 2 of 4 tests passed.

    Clear brand consistency but lacks author identification and term definitions.

    Technical Accessibility95/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent crawler access and meta tag implementation.

    How qualified.com can improve its AI visibility

    • Implement Visible Publication Dates (high priority)
    • Define Author Entities with Schema (high priority)
    • Add Authoritative Outbound Citations (medium priority)
    • Expand Content-Specific Schema (medium priority)
    • Reduce Sentence Length for Clarity (medium priority)

    How qualified.com compares to its competitors