LLMaoLLMao

    AI search visibility report · 2026-10-16

    How AI assistants see infura.io

    infura.io has an AI visibility score of 39/100. The site passed 8 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Content Structure. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Schema.org Markup.

    How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read infura.io

    Readability40/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    Sentences are extremely long and complex, which hinders automated readability scores.

    Schema.org Markup0/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 5 tests passed.

    No JSON-LD schema was detected on the page.

    Authority & Trust Signals40/100

    Result: weak. 1 of 5 tests passed.

    Trust pages are present, but the site lacks specific author credentials and publication dates.

    Citation & Source Quality48/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    The site lacks authoritative outbound links and formal inline citations for technical claims.

    Content Freshness0/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    No visible or machine-readable dates were found on the analyzed page.

    Content Structure66/100

    Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    Paragraph structure is excellent, but semantic HTML and heading hierarchy need improvement.

    Entity Definition48/100

    Result: weak. 1 of 4 tests passed.

    The brand is consistent, but the lack of schema and author identification limits entity clarity.

    Technical Accessibility75/100

    Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent crawler access and social meta, but the meta description is too short.

    How infura.io can improve its AI visibility

    • Implement Core JSON-LD Schema (high priority)
    • Add Publication and Modification Dates (high priority)
    • Improve Sentence Readability (medium priority)
    • Define Author Entities (medium priority)
    • Optimize Meta Description Length (low priority)

    How infura.io compares to its competitors