AI search visibility report · 2026-10-17
How AI assistants see moralis.io
moralis.io has an AI visibility score of 74/100. The site passed 26 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Content Structure. The areas to improve are Authority & Trust Signals and Entity Definition.
How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read moralis.io
Readability70/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Sentence length is ideal, but the technical nature of the content results in a low Flesch Reading Ease score.
Schema.org Markup68/100
Result: average. 4 of 5 tests passed.
Core schemas are present and valid, but the site lacks specific content schemas for its products and services.
Authority & Trust Signals64/100
Result: average. 2 of 5 tests passed.
Strong trust pages and recent publication info, but lacks complete contact details and social proof schema.
Citation & Source Quality67/100
Result: average. 2 of 4 tests passed.
High volume of internal and product links, but lacks external citations to authoritative third-party sources.
Content Freshness75/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent recency with content modified within 48 hours of analysis. Lacks explicit versioning signals.
Content Structure85/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Perfect heading hierarchy and strong semantic HTML usage. Paragraphs are concise and well-structured.
Entity Definition65/100
Result: average. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Consistent branding and clear term definitions. Missing a dedicated About page link and Person schema for authors.
Technical Accessibility100/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent technical setup with full AI crawler access and strong social meta tags.
How moralis.io can improve its AI visibility
- Complete Contact Information (high priority)
- Add Content-Specific Schemas (high priority)
- Establish Dedicated About Page (medium priority)
- Implement Social Proof Schema (medium priority)
- Add Update Signals (low priority)
How moralis.io compares to its competitors
- Alchemy (alchemy.com) — score 78/100
- Infura (infura.io) — score 39/100
- QuickNode (quicknode.com) — score 74/100
- Tatum (tatum.io) — score 74/100