AI search visibility report · 2026-05-14
How AI assistants see tatum.io
tatum.io has an AI visibility score of 74/100. The site passed 27 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Content Freshness and Readability. The areas to improve are Citation & Source Quality and Schema.org Markup.
How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read tatum.io
Readability85/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
High clarity and professional tone, though some technical jargon is undefined for lay audiences.
Schema.org Markup60/100
Result: average. 4 of 5 tests passed.
Valid Organization schema present, but lacks deeper Product or FAQ schemas.
Authority & Trust Signals70/100
Result: average. 4 of 5 tests passed.
Strong social proof with logos and testimonials, but lacks individual author credentials and detailed trust pages on the homepage.
Citation & Source Quality40/100
Result: weak. 1 of 4 tests passed.
Lacks external citations or primary source links for claims about '100+ protocols'.
Content Freshness95/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent freshness signals with a 'Last Published' date from May 12, 2026, and current copyright.
Content Structure65/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Uses semantic HTML but lacks a formal heading hierarchy (H2/H3) in the main body content.
Entity Definition75/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Clear brand identity and 'About' context, though author identification is missing.
Technical Accessibility80/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Good meta descriptions and social tags, but heavy reliance on JS for some interactive elements.
How tatum.io can improve its AI visibility
- Expand Content-Specific Schema (high priority)
- Implement Author Schema (high priority)
- Optimize Heading Hierarchy (medium priority)
- Add Authoritative Outbound Links (medium priority)
- Explicit AI Crawler Permissions (medium priority)
How tatum.io compares to its competitors
- Alchemy (alchemy.com) — score 78/100
- Infura (infura.io) — score 39/100
- QuickNode (quicknode.com) — score 74/100
- Moralis (moralis.io) — score 74/100