LLMaoLLMao

    AI search visibility report · 2026-06-20

    How AI assistants see rauno.me

    rauno.me has an AI visibility score of 26/100. The site passed 8 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Readability and Technical Accessibility. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Authority & Trust Signals.

    How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read rauno.me

    Readability65/100

    Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    Content is clear and concise, though very brief. Sentence length is optimal for LLM parsing.

    Schema.org Markup0/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 5 tests passed.

    Completely lacks JSON-LD schema markup.

    Authority & Trust Signals0/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 5 tests passed.

    Lacks contact info, trust pages, and structured publication dates. Social proof is implied but not marked up.

    Citation & Source Quality16/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    Contains external links but lacks authoritative citations or inline references for claims.

    Content Freshness0/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    No publication or modification dates found in metadata or visible text.

    Content Structure42/100

    Result: weak. 1 of 4 tests passed.

    Basic heading hierarchy present but lacks semantic tags like <section> or <nav>. Paragraphs are extremely short.

    Entity Definition40/100

    Result: weak. 1 of 4 tests passed.

    No dedicated about page or Person schema to define the entity for LLMs.

    Technical Accessibility60/100

    Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent AI crawler access and social meta, but lacks a meta description and has partial JS dependency.

    How rauno.me can improve its AI visibility

    • Add Person and Occupation Schema (high priority)
    • Establish Entity Authority (high priority)
    • Add Meta Description (medium priority)
    • Enhance Semantic HTML Structure (medium priority)
    • Implement Temporal Signals (low priority)

    How rauno.me compares to its competitors