LLMaoLLMao

    AI search visibility report · 2026-10-26

    How AI assistants see paco.me

    paco.me has an AI visibility score of 37/100. The site passed 13 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Citation & Source Quality and Readability. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Schema.org Markup.

    How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read paco.me

    Readability70/100

    Result: average. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Content is very readable with short sentences and clear language, though some technical jargon is undefined.

    Schema.org Markup0/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 5 tests passed.

    No JSON-LD or microdata present on the page. This is a significant gap for LLM discovery.

    Authority & Trust Signals8/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 5 tests passed.

    Lacks formal trust pages, credentials schema, and publication dates. Contact info is limited to a Twitter link.

    Citation & Source Quality74/100

    Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    Good use of inline citations for projects, but lacks links to high-authority external references like documentation or news.

    Content Freshness0/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    No machine-readable or visible dates found for recent content, making it difficult to verify recency.

    Content Structure64/100

    Result: average. 2 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent heading hierarchy, but lacks semantic sectioning and a table of contents for longer sections.

    Entity Definition35/100

    Result: weak. 1 of 4 tests passed.

    The entity is clear through the H1, but lacks an About page and structured author identification.

    Technical Accessibility70/100

    Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent crawler access and JS independence, but missing a meta description.

    How paco.me can improve its AI visibility

    • Implement Person Schema (high priority)
    • Add Meta Description (high priority)
    • Create Dedicated About Page (medium priority)
    • Add Visible Dates to Content (medium priority)
    • Define Technical Terms Clearly (low priority)

    How paco.me compares to its competitors