AI search visibility report · 2026-06-04
How AI assistants see leerob.io
leerob.io has an AI visibility score of 57/100. The site passed 19 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Readability and Schema.org Markup. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Authority & Trust Signals.
How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read leerob.io
Readability80/100
Result: strong. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Content is highly readable and clear, though some technical terms could be more explicitly defined.
Schema.org Markup74/100
Result: average. 4 of 5 tests passed.
Valid Person schema present, but missing core WebSite/WebPage schemas.
Authority & Trust Signals40/100
Result: weak. 2 of 5 tests passed.
Strong author credentials via Person schema, but lacks trust pages and visible publication dates.
Citation & Source Quality74/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent use of inline citations for claims, though lacks links to traditional high-authority (.gov/.edu) domains.
Content Freshness0/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
Complete lack of date metadata or visible timestamps makes it impossible for LLMs to determine recency.
Content Structure64/100
Result: average. 2 of 4 tests passed.
Good heading hierarchy and paragraph flow, but lacks semantic HTML sections.
Entity Definition55/100
Result: weak. 2 of 4 tests passed.
Strong Person schema and consistent naming, but lacks a dedicated About page and Organization schema for the site itself.
Technical Accessibility70/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent AI crawler access and social meta, but meta description is too short and there is a JS dependency.
How leerob.io can improve its AI visibility
- Implement Visible Publication Dates (high priority)
- Expand Core Schema Markup (high priority)
- Add Trust and Policy Pages (medium priority)
- Optimize Meta Description Length (medium priority)
- Improve Semantic HTML Usage (medium priority)
How leerob.io compares to its competitors
- Kent C. Dodds (kentcdodds.com) — score 45/100
- Wes Bos (wesbos.com) — score 43/100
- Josh W. Comeau (joshwcomeau.com) — score 46/100
- Shawn Wang (swyx) (swyx.io) — score 69/100