LLMaoLLMao

    AI search visibility report · 2026-06-05

    How AI assistants see anthropic.com

    anthropic.com has an AI visibility score of 36/100. The site passed 12 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Citation & Source Quality. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Schema.org Markup.

    How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read anthropic.com

    Readability25/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    Extremely low readability score due to very long, complex sentences (avg 39 words).

    Schema.org Markup0/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 5 tests passed.

    Total absence of JSON-LD or any structured data format.

    Authority & Trust Signals20/100

    Result: weak. 1 of 5 tests passed.

    Strong trust pages (Privacy/Terms) but lacks structured author credentials and contact metadata.

    Citation & Source Quality74/100

    Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent use of inline citations for claims, though lacks links to external authoritative third-party sources.

    Content Freshness0/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    Content is very recent (May 2026), but lacks any machine-readable date signals (Schema/Meta/Time tags).

    Content Structure73/100

    Result: average. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Good use of semantic HTML and sections, but contains skipped heading levels.

    Entity Definition20/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    Brand consistency is high, but lacks an About page with Organization schema or Person schema for authors.

    Technical Accessibility95/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent crawler access and social metadata; content is fully accessible without JavaScript.

    How anthropic.com can improve its AI visibility

    • Add JSON-LD Structured Data (high priority)
    • Define Author Entities (high priority)
    • Improve Content Readability (medium priority)
    • Strengthen Entity Definition (medium priority)
    • Semantically Mark Dates (low priority)

    How anthropic.com compares to its competitors