AI search visibility report · 2026-06-20
How AI assistants see conga.com
conga.com has an AI visibility score of 60/100. The site passed 22 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Content Structure. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Authority & Trust Signals.
How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read conga.com
Readability55/100
Result: weak. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Very low readability score (20.3) indicates content is highly complex and difficult for general LLM summarization.
Schema.org Markup74/100
Result: average. 4 of 5 tests passed.
Core Organization and WebSite schemas are present and valid, but content-specific schemas are missing.
Authority & Trust Signals40/100
Result: weak. 2 of 5 tests passed.
Strong social proof with major brand logos, but lacks specific author credentials and detailed contact info.
Citation & Source Quality67/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Good use of inline links, but lacks citations to high-authority external primary sources.
Content Freshness0/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
Critical failure: No publication or modification dates found in metadata or visible text.
Content Structure77/100
Result: average. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Strong semantic HTML usage, though heading hierarchy contains skipped levels.
Entity Definition65/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Clear brand consistency and about page, but lacks author-level entity definition.
Technical Accessibility89/100
Result: strong. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent crawler access and JS independence, though social meta tags are incomplete.
How conga.com can improve its AI visibility
- Add Visible Publication/Modified Dates (high priority)
- Implement Content-Specific Schema (high priority)
- Enhance Author Identification (medium priority)
- Improve Content Readability (medium priority)
- Complete Contact Information Profile (low priority)
How conga.com compares to its competitors
- Ironclad (ironcladapp.com) — score 72/100
- DocuSign (docusign.com) — score 74/100
- PandaDoc (pandadoc.com) — score 85/100
- GetAccept (getaccept.com) — score 66/100
- Coupa Software (coupa.com) — score 79/100