AI search visibility report · 2026-07-09
How AI assistants see aerospike.com
aerospike.com has an AI visibility score of 66/100. The site passed 21 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Content Freshness. The areas to improve are Citation & Source Quality and Entity Definition.
How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read aerospike.com
Readability60/100
Result: average. 2 of 4 tests passed.
Technical clarity is high for experts, but the Flesch score is very low, making it less accessible for general LLM summaries.
Schema.org Markup68/100
Result: average. 4 of 5 tests passed.
Solid technical implementation of core schemas, but missing critical content-level schemas like Product or FAQ.
Authority & Trust Signals70/100
Result: average. 4 of 5 tests passed.
Strong trust signals via client logos and clear contact info, but lacks author-level expertise markers.
Citation & Source Quality32/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
Lacks external authoritative citations and inline references for specific performance claims.
Content Freshness75/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent freshness with recent modification dates (May 2026) and clear publication signals.
Content Structure66/100
Result: average. 2 of 4 tests passed.
Good use of semantic HTML, but undermined by duplicate H1s and poor paragraph length distribution.
Entity Definition60/100
Result: average. 2 of 4 tests passed.
Brand entity is clear, but lacks specific Person entities for authors and a dedicated About link in the footer.
Technical Accessibility100/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Perfect technical setup for AI crawlers with full meta support and JS-independent content.
How aerospike.com can improve its AI visibility
- Fix H1 Duplication and Heading Hierarchy (high priority)
- Add Content-Specific Schema (Product/FAQ) (high priority)
- Implement Author Person Schema and Bios (medium priority)
- Add Authoritative Outbound Citations (medium priority)
- Improve Content Readability for General LLM Queries (medium priority)
How aerospike.com compares to its competitors
- MongoDB (mongodb.com) — score 53/100
- Redis (redis.io) — score 67/100
- ScyllaDB (scylladb.com) — score 73/100
- DataStax (Cassandra) (datastax.com) — score 41/100
- Pinecone (pinecone.io)