AI search visibility report · 2026-10-18
How AI assistants see scylladb.com
scylladb.com has an AI visibility score of 73/100. The site passed 24 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Schema.org Markup and Technical Accessibility. The areas to improve are Content Structure and Readability.
How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read scylladb.com
Readability60/100
Result: average. 2 of 4 tests passed.
Sentence length is acceptable, but the reading ease score is too low for general technical clarity.
Schema.org Markup88/100
Result: strong. 5 of 5 tests passed.
Excellent technical implementation of JSON-LD and core schemas, though some context tags are missing.
Authority & Trust Signals78/100
Result: average. 4 of 5 tests passed.
Strong trust signals with clear dates and legal pages, but lacks structured social proof and author credentials.
Citation & Source Quality74/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Good use of inline citations for internal claims, but lacks links to high-authority external domains.
Content Freshness75/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent freshness with very recent updates and clear publication dates.
Content Structure58/100
Result: weak. 2 of 4 tests passed.
Semantic HTML is good, but heading hierarchy and paragraph structure are weak.
Entity Definition65/100
Result: average. 2 of 4 tests passed.
Strong organization entity definition, but fails to identify individual authors via schema.
Technical Accessibility85/100
Result: strong. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Great crawler access and JS independence, but meta descriptions are poorly optimized.
How scylladb.com can improve its AI visibility
- Fix Heading Hierarchy and H1 Duplication (high priority)
- Implement Author Person Schema (high priority)
- Optimize Meta Description Length (medium priority)
- Improve Paragraph Depth and Flow (medium priority)
- Enhance External Authority Citations (medium priority)
How scylladb.com compares to its competitors
- MongoDB (mongodb.com) — score 53/100
- DataStax (datastax.com) — score 41/100
- Aerospike (aerospike.com) — score 66/100
- Couchbase (couchbase.com) — score 68/100