LLMaoLLMao

    AI search visibility report · 2026-10-26

    How AI assistants see cfr.org

    cfr.org has an AI visibility score of 63/100. The site passed 25 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Citation & Source Quality. The areas to improve are Schema.org Markup and Readability.

    How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read cfr.org

    Readability60/100

    Result: average. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Content is complex with long sentences, resulting in a low readability score for general audiences.

    Schema.org Markup0/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 5 tests passed.

    No JSON-LD schema markup was detected on the page. This is a significant gap for LLM optimization.

    Authority & Trust Signals66/100

    Result: average. 3 of 5 tests passed.

    Strong publication dates and trust pages, but lacks structured author credentials and social proof schema.

    Citation & Source Quality86/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent use of inline citations and authoritative outbound links. Claims are well-supported.

    Content Freshness75/100

    Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    Content is very recent with clear dates, but lacks explicit update signals like changelogs.

    Content Structure82/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Good use of semantic HTML, but the heading hierarchy contains skipped levels.

    Entity Definition63/100

    Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    Clear entity consistency and about page, but lacks structured author identification.

    Technical Accessibility95/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent crawler access and JS independence. Social meta tags are mostly complete.

    How cfr.org can improve its AI visibility

    • Implement JSON-LD Schema Markup (high priority)
    • Enhance Author Expertise Signals (high priority)
    • Correct Heading Hierarchy (medium priority)
    • Add Content Update Signals (medium priority)
    • Improve Content Readability (low priority)

    How cfr.org compares to its competitors