LLMaoLLMao

    AI search visibility report · 2026-10-26

    How AI assistants see chathamhouse.org

    chathamhouse.org has an AI visibility score of 71/100. The site passed 22 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Content Structure. The areas to improve are Readability and Entity Definition.

    How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read chathamhouse.org

    Readability30/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    Critical failure in sentence length and Flesch-Kincaid scores due to text density.

    Schema.org Markup68/100

    Result: average. 4 of 5 tests passed.

    Core technical schema is present and valid, but content-specific schemas are missing.

    Authority & Trust Signals66/100

    Result: average. 2 of 5 tests passed.

    Strong contact info and recent dates, but lacks author credentials and full trust pages.

    Citation & Source Quality74/100

    Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    Good inline citations but lacks links to high-authority external domains like .gov or .edu.

    Content Freshness75/100

    Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    Content is very recent (3 days old), though it lacks explicit update/revision signals.

    Content Structure89/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent heading hierarchy and semantic HTML usage. Organization is clear.

    Entity Definition63/100

    Result: average. 2 of 4 tests passed.

    About page is present, but the lack of author identification via schema limits entity clarity.

    Technical Accessibility100/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Perfect scores for crawler access, JS independence, and social metadata.

    How chathamhouse.org can improve its AI visibility

    • Fix Sentence Structure (high priority)
    • Implement Content Schemas (high priority)
    • Enhance Author Profiles (medium priority)
    • Add Missing Trust Pages (medium priority)
    • Add Update Signals (low priority)

    How chathamhouse.org compares to its competitors