AI search visibility report · 2026-05-16
How AI assistants see cognism.com
cognism.com has an AI visibility score of 79/100. The site passed 29 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Content Structure and Readability. The areas to improve are Citation & Source Quality and Schema.org Markup.
How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read cognism.com
Readability85/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Professional B2B tone with good sentence length. Jargon like 'ICP' and 'GTM' is used but generally contextualized within the industry.
Schema.org Markup65/100
Result: average. 4 of 5 tests passed.
Basic HubSpot-generated schema is likely present, but specific JSON-LD for Products, FAQs, or Organizations was not explicitly detailed in the scrape.
Authority & Trust Signals75/100
Result: average. 5 of 5 tests passed.
Strong social proof with 4,000+ customers and specific testimonials, but lacks explicit publication dates and detailed author credentials on the homepage.
Citation & Source Quality60/100
Result: average. 2 of 4 tests passed.
Claims are well-supported by internal case studies and customer data, but lacks external authoritative citations to third-party data or regulatory bodies.
Content Freshness85/100
Result: strong. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent use of '2026' branding and current year context. However, lacks specific 'last modified' metadata in the visible HTML.
Content Structure90/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Clear H1-H3 hierarchy and logical flow. Uses semantic sections effectively for different product offerings.
Entity Definition80/100
Result: strong. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Strong brand consistency and clear definitions of 'Sales Intelligence' and 'DaaS'. About page is linked but Person entities are not defined on the homepage.
Technical Accessibility85/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Good meta descriptions and social meta tags. Content is highly accessible, though AI-specific crawler instructions were not verified.
How cognism.com can improve its AI visibility
- Expand Content-Specific Schema (high priority)
- Explicitly Allow AI Crawlers in Robots.txt (high priority)
- Add Explicit Publication Timestamps (medium priority)
- Implement Author/Person Schema (medium priority)
- Strengthen External Citations for Compliance Claims (low priority)
How cognism.com compares to its competitors
- ZoomInfo (zoominfo.com) — score 83/100
- Lusha (lusha.com) — score 72/100
- Apollo.io (apollo.io) — score 82/100
- Clearbit (HubSpot) (clearbit.com) — score 52/100