LLMaoLLMao

    AI search visibility report · 2026-10-22

    How AI assistants see ifttt.com

    ifttt.com has an AI visibility score of 59/100. The site passed 16 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Schema.org Markup. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Authority & Trust Signals.

    How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read ifttt.com

    Readability50/100

    Result: weak. 1 of 4 tests passed.

    Sentence length is significantly higher than the recommended threshold for LLM clarity.

    Schema.org Markup74/100

    Result: average. 4 of 5 tests passed.

    Core technical schemas are excellent, but content-specific schemas are missing.

    Authority & Trust Signals46/100

    Result: weak. 1 of 5 tests passed.

    Strong contact info but lacks publication dates and comprehensive trust pages.

    Citation & Source Quality48/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    Lacks links to authoritative external sources and formal citation structures.

    Content Freshness0/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    No visible or machine-readable dates found on the page.

    Content Structure71/100

    Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent heading hierarchy and semantic organization, though paragraph flow is fragmented.

    Entity Definition70/100

    Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    Strong brand consistency and about page presence, but lacks detailed author entities.

    Technical Accessibility100/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Perfect scores for crawler access, JS independence, and social metadata.

    How ifttt.com can improve its AI visibility

    • Implement Visible Publication and Modification Dates (high priority)
    • Expand Trust and Transparency Pages (high priority)
    • Implement Content-Specific Schemas (FAQ) (medium priority)
    • Reduce Average Sentence Length (medium priority)
    • Add Authoritative Outbound Links (low priority)

    How ifttt.com compares to its competitors