AI search visibility report · 2026-10-17
How AI assistants see bubble.io
bubble.io has an AI visibility score of 48/100. The site passed 17 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Readability. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Citation & Source Quality.
How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read bubble.io
Readability90/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
High readability scores with appropriate sentence lengths for a general audience.
Schema.org Markup74/100
Result: average. 4 of 5 tests passed.
Valid core schemas present, but lacks content-specific schemas like Product or FAQ.
Authority & Trust Signals44/100
Result: weak. 2 of 5 tests passed.
Strong social proof and contact info, but lacks publication dates and detailed author credentials in schema.
Citation & Source Quality12/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
Lacks authoritative outbound links and inline citations for factual claims.
Content Freshness0/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
No visible or machine-readable dates found on the page.
Content Structure18/100
Result: weak. 1 of 4 tests passed.
Good heading hierarchy but completely lacks semantic HTML tags and paragraph elements in the raw structure.
Entity Definition50/100
Result: weak. 2 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent About page and brand consistency, but lacks author identification.
Technical Accessibility100/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent technical setup with full AI crawler access and strong social meta tags.
How bubble.io can improve its AI visibility
- Implement Semantic HTML Elements (high priority)
- Add Visible Publication Dates (high priority)
- Expand Content-Specific Schema Markup (high priority)
- Add Authoritative Outbound Citations (medium priority)
- Define Author Entities with Person Schema (medium priority)
How bubble.io compares to its competitors
- FlutterFlow (flutterflow.io)
- Webflow (webflow.com) — score 56/100
- Adalo (adalo.com)
- Softr (softr.io)
- Glide (glideapps.com)