LLMaoLLMao

    AI search visibility report · 2026-10-17

    How AI assistants see webflow.com

    webflow.com has an AI visibility score of 56/100. The site passed 17 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Schema.org Markup. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Readability.

    How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read webflow.com

    Readability30/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    Extremely poor readability scores with excessively long sentences.

    Schema.org Markup74/100

    Result: average. 4 of 5 tests passed.

    Core schemas are present and valid, but content-specific schemas are missing.

    Authority & Trust Signals44/100

    Result: weak. 1 of 5 tests passed.

    Trust pages are excellent, but contact information and author credentials are weak.

    Citation & Source Quality74/100

    Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    Good inline citations but lacks links to high-authority external domains.

    Content Freshness0/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    No dates found in the content or schema. LLMs cannot determine recency.

    Content Structure67/100

    Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    Good semantic HTML but failed heading hierarchy due to multiple H1s.

    Entity Definition60/100

    Result: average. 2 of 4 tests passed.

    Strong about page and brand consistency, but lacks author identification.

    Technical Accessibility90/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Strong technical foundations with good meta tags and JS independence.

    How webflow.com can improve its AI visibility

    • Reduce Sentence Length (high priority)
    • Implement Author Schema and Credentials (high priority)
    • Add Publication and Modification Dates (high priority)
    • Fix Heading Hierarchy (Single H1) (medium priority)
    • Expand Content Schema Usage (medium priority)
    • Improve Contact Information Visibility (low priority)

    How webflow.com compares to its competitors