LLMaoLLMao

    AI search visibility report · 2026-10-09

    How AI assistants see framer.com

    framer.com has an AI visibility score of 55/100. The site passed 19 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Schema.org Markup. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Citation & Source Quality.

    How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read framer.com

    Readability65/100

    Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    Good reading ease, though sentence length is slightly high for technical content.

    Schema.org Markup74/100

    Result: average. 4 of 5 tests passed.

    Valid JSON-LD present but limited to basic Organization schema.

    Authority & Trust Signals32/100

    Result: weak. 1 of 5 tests passed.

    Basic contact info and trust pages exist, but lack credentials and publication history.

    Citation & Source Quality27/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    Lacks authoritative outbound links and inline citations for factual claims.

    Content Freshness15/100

    Result: weak. 1 of 4 tests passed.

    No specific publication or modification dates found despite recent update signals.

    Content Structure68/100

    Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    Good semantic HTML and organization, but paragraph structure is fragmented.

    Entity Definition55/100

    Result: weak. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    Strong brand consistency but lacks author identification and a dedicated about page.

    Technical Accessibility100/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent technical setup with full AI crawler access and social meta tags.

    How framer.com can improve its AI visibility

    • Create a Dedicated About Page (high priority)
    • Add Authoritative Outbound Citations (high priority)
    • Improve Paragraph Structure (medium priority)
    • Implement Visible Update Signals (medium priority)
    • Add Content-Specific Schemas (medium priority)

    How framer.com compares to its competitors