AI search visibility report · 2026-05-14
How AI assistants see nansen.ai
nansen.ai has an AI visibility score of 74/100. The site passed 23 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Content Freshness and Readability. The areas to improve are Schema.org Markup and Citation & Source Quality.
How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read nansen.ai
Readability85/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
High clarity and good use of active voice, though some crypto-jargon is undefined.
Schema.org Markup0/100
Result: weak. 0 of 5 tests passed.
No JSON-LD blocks found in the provided HTML, which is a significant missed opportunity for LLM SEO.
Authority & Trust Signals70/100
Result: average. 4 of 5 tests passed.
Strong social proof and clear contact links, but lacks detailed author credentials and a dedicated About page.
Citation & Source Quality50/100
Result: weak. 2 of 4 tests passed.
Claims are specific but lack direct outbound citations to primary sources or external verification.
Content Freshness95/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent freshness with 2026 copyright and recent publication metadata.
Content Structure65/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Uses semantic HTML but has a fragmented heading hierarchy (skipping H2/H3 in sections).
Entity Definition60/100
Result: average. 2 of 4 tests passed.
Brand consistency is high, but entity definition is limited by the lack of an About page and Person schema.
Technical Accessibility80/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Good meta descriptions and social meta, but robots.txt was not provided for verification.
How nansen.ai can improve its AI visibility
- Add Structured Data (JSON-LD) (high priority)
- Enhance Entity Trust Signals (high priority)
- Improve Fact Verification with Citations (medium priority)
- Optimize Heading Hierarchy (medium priority)
- Optimize AI Crawler Access (low priority)
How nansen.ai compares to its competitors
- Dune Analytics (dune.com) — score 78/100
- Arkham Intelligence (arkhamintelligence.com) — score 59/100
- Glassnode (glassnode.com) — score 78/100
- Token Terminal (tokenterminal.com) — score 73/100