LLMaoLLMao

    AI search visibility report · 2026-10-26

    How AI assistants see livingsocial.com

    livingsocial.com has an AI visibility score of 32/100. The site passed 9 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Content Structure. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Schema.org Markup.

    How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read livingsocial.com

    Readability40/100

    Result: weak. 1 of 4 tests passed.

    Extremely low readability due to excessive sentence length and poor Flesch-Kincaid score.

    Schema.org Markup0/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 5 tests passed.

    Complete absence of JSON-LD or microdata schemas.

    Authority & Trust Signals18/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 5 tests passed.

    Missing physical contact details and publication dates. Trust pages are limited to terms.

    Citation & Source Quality17/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    Lacks authoritative outbound links and inline citations for product claims.

    Content Freshness0/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    No visible or machine-readable dates found to verify content recency.

    Content Structure71/100

    Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    Good heading hierarchy but lacks section elements for better content grouping.

    Entity Definition25/100

    Result: weak. 1 of 4 tests passed.

    Missing About page and author identification. Entity consistency is moderate.

    Technical Accessibility95/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent crawler access and JS independence, though social meta is incomplete.

    How livingsocial.com can improve its AI visibility

    • Implement Core JSON-LD Schema (high priority)
    • Reduce Sentence Complexity (high priority)
    • Enhance Trust and Entity Signals (medium priority)
    • Add Explicit Freshness Signals (medium priority)
    • Improve Outbound Citations (low priority)

    How livingsocial.com compares to its competitors