LLMaoLLMao

    AI search visibility report · 2026-06-21

    How AI assistants see adp.com

    adp.com has an AI visibility score of 38/100. The site passed 11 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Content Structure. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Schema.org Markup.

    How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read adp.com

    Readability40/100

    Result: weak. 1 of 4 tests passed.

    Content is highly technical and dense, making it difficult for general LLM summarization.

    Schema.org Markup0/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 5 tests passed.

    Complete absence of JSON-LD structured data.

    Authority & Trust Signals36/100

    Result: weak. 2 of 5 tests passed.

    Strong social proof and contact links, but lacks physical address and clear publication dates.

    Citation & Source Quality47/100

    Result: weak. 1 of 4 tests passed.

    Good use of inline links for claims, but lacks external authoritative citations (.gov/.edu).

    Content Freshness0/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    No dates found in metadata or visible text to verify content recency.

    Content Structure58/100

    Result: weak. 2 of 4 tests passed.

    Multiple H1s and skipped heading levels hinder structural clarity for LLMs.

    Entity Definition35/100

    Result: weak. 1 of 4 tests passed.

    No dedicated About page or Person schema for authors/leadership.

    Technical Accessibility95/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent AI crawler access and social metadata implementation.

    How adp.com can improve its AI visibility

    • Implement JSON-LD Structured Data (high priority)
    • Add Visible Publication/Modification Dates (high priority)
    • Optimize Heading Hierarchy (medium priority)
    • Strengthen Entity Definition with About Page (medium priority)
    • Enhance Contact Transparency (medium priority)

    How adp.com compares to its competitors