AI search visibility report · 2026-06-12
How AI assistants see marginalrevolution.com
marginalrevolution.com has an AI visibility score of 77/100. The site passed 28 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Citation & Source Quality and Technical Accessibility. The areas to improve are Authority & Trust Signals and Schema.org Markup.
How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read marginalrevolution.com
Readability90/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Content is well-structured for an academic/intellectual audience with appropriate sentence lengths.
Schema.org Markup62/100
Result: average. 4 of 5 tests passed.
Basic WebSite schema is present and valid, but no content-level (BlogPosting) schema exists.
Authority & Trust Signals60/100
Result: average. 2 of 5 tests passed.
Strong publication dates and trust pages, but lacks detailed contact info and author credential schema.
Citation & Source Quality100/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent use of authoritative outbound links and inline citations within paragraphs.
Content Freshness75/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Content is extremely fresh with daily updates and clear timestamps.
Content Structure81/100
Result: strong. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Semantic HTML is excellent, but the lack of an H1 tag is a significant structural flaw.
Entity Definition70/100
Result: average. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Clear brand consistency and about page, but lacks structured author data.
Technical Accessibility93/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent crawler access and JS-independence, though meta description is brief.
How marginalrevolution.com can improve its AI visibility
- Fix Heading Hierarchy (Missing H1) (high priority)
- Add Content-Specific Schema (BlogPosting) (high priority)
- Enhance Author Entities with Schema (medium priority)
- Improve Contact Transparency (medium priority)
- Optimize Meta Description Length (low priority)
How marginalrevolution.com compares to its competitors
- Econlib (Library of Economics and Liberty) (econlib.org) — score 68/100
- FRED Blog (St. Louis Fed) (stlouisfed.org) — score 44/100
- Peterson Institute for International Economics (piie.com) — score 69/100
- CEPR VoxEU (voxeu.org) — score 49/100