LLMaoLLMao

    AI search visibility report · 2026-10-22

    How AI assistants see retool.com

    retool.com has an AI visibility score of 57/100. The site passed 17 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Content Structure. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Citation & Source Quality.

    How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read retool.com

    Readability30/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    Extremely long sentences and low readability scores hinder LLM comprehension.

    Schema.org Markup74/100

    Result: average. 4 of 5 tests passed.

    Valid JSON-LD and core Organization schema present, but lacks specific content schemas.

    Authority & Trust Signals50/100

    Result: weak. 3 of 5 tests passed.

    Strong trust pages and contact info, but lacks publication dates and author credentials.

    Citation & Source Quality27/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    Lacks authoritative outbound links and inline citations for technical claims.

    Content Freshness15/100

    Result: weak. 1 of 4 tests passed.

    No visible dates or schema dates found, though update signals are present.

    Content Structure75/100

    Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent heading hierarchy and semantic HTML, but paragraph structure is imbalanced.

    Entity Definition65/100

    Result: average. 2 of 4 tests passed.

    Strong brand consistency and About page, but lacks author identification.

    Technical Accessibility100/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent crawler access, social meta, and JS-independent content.

    How retool.com can improve its AI visibility

    • Implement Visible Publication Dates (high priority)
    • Reduce Sentence Complexity (high priority)
    • Expand Content Schemas (medium priority)
    • Add Authoritative Outbound Citations (medium priority)
    • Define Author Entities (low priority)

    How retool.com compares to its competitors