LLMaoLLMao

    AI search visibility report · 2026-06-09

    How AI assistants see spacelift.io

    spacelift.io has an AI visibility score of 59/100. The site passed 17 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Schema.org Markup. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Readability.

    How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read spacelift.io

    Readability30/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    Very low Flesch-Kincaid score due to extremely long, technical sentences.

    Schema.org Markup74/100

    Result: average. 4 of 5 tests passed.

    Valid Organization schema present, but missing specific content schemas like Product or FAQ.

    Authority & Trust Signals56/100

    Result: weak. 3 of 5 tests passed.

    Strong contact and trust pages, but lacks individual author credentials and publication dates.

    Citation & Source Quality48/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    Lacks authoritative outbound links and formal inline citations for technical claims.

    Content Freshness15/100

    Result: weak. 1 of 4 tests passed.

    No visible publication or modification dates found, though update signals are present.

    Content Structure71/100

    Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent heading hierarchy and semantic HTML usage, though paragraph structure is slightly fragmented.

    Entity Definition65/100

    Result: average. 2 of 4 tests passed.

    Strong Organization definition and About page, but lacks Person schema for authors.

    Technical Accessibility93/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent AI crawler access and social metadata implementation.

    How spacelift.io can improve its AI visibility

    • Add Author/Person Schema (high priority)
    • Expose Publication Dates (high priority)
    • Expand Content Schemas (medium priority)
    • Optimize Sentence Length (medium priority)
    • Add Authoritative Outbound Links (low priority)

    How spacelift.io compares to its competitors