LLMaoLLMao

    AI search visibility report · 2026-02-14

    How AI assistants see responsive.io

    responsive.io has an AI visibility score of 84/100. The site passed 32 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Schema.org Markup and Content Freshness. The areas to improve are Citation & Source Quality and Content Structure.

    How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read responsive.io

    Readability80/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Professional and clear, though some industry jargon (RFXs, VSQs) is used without immediate definition.

    Schema.org Markup95/100

    Result: strong. 5 of 5 tests passed.

    Comprehensive JSON-LD including Organization, WebSite, SoftwareApplication, and VideoObject.

    Authority & Trust Signals85/100

    Result: strong. 5 of 5 tests passed.

    Strong social proof with Fortune 100 mentions and G2 ratings, but lacks direct links to editorial standards.

    Citation & Source Quality60/100

    Result: average. 2 of 4 tests passed.

    Claims are specific and attributed to customers, but lack outbound links to primary data or third-party review sites.

    Content Freshness95/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent freshness signals with a 2026 modification date and 2025 report mentions.

    Content Structure80/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Good use of semantic HTML and organization, though some heading levels are skipped.

    Entity Definition85/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Strong Organization schema and consistent branding, but lacks Person schema for authors/advocates.

    Technical Accessibility90/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent meta descriptions and social meta; content is highly accessible.

    How responsive.io can improve its AI visibility

    • Verify Third-Party Social Proof (high priority)
    • Define AI Transparency Standards (high priority)
    • Add Person Schema for Testimonials (medium priority)
    • Fix Heading Hierarchy Gaps (low priority)

    How responsive.io compares to its competitors