AI search visibility report · 2026-02-21
How AI assistants see ombud.com
ombud.com has an AI visibility score of 58/100. The site passed 18 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Readability. The areas to improve are Schema.org Markup and Citation & Source Quality.
How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read ombud.com
Readability75/100
Result: average. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Content is professional and clear, though it uses some industry jargon (RevOps, SOW, POC) that could be better defined for general LLM understanding.
Schema.org Markup0/100
Result: weak. 0 of 5 tests passed.
No JSON-LD schema was detected in the provided HTML, which is a significant missed opportunity for LLM indexing.
Authority & Trust Signals65/100
Result: average. 3 of 5 tests passed.
Strong social proof with enterprise logos and testimonials, but lacks detailed author credentials and a clear 'About' entity definition.
Citation & Source Quality40/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
The page makes several high-level claims about efficiency and cost reduction without linking to primary data or external studies.
Content Freshness50/100
Result: weak. 2 of 4 tests passed.
Copyright is current (2026), but there are no specific publication or 'last modified' dates for the core content.
Content Structure70/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Good use of H1 and H2 tags, but the hierarchy is shallow and lacks advanced semantic HTML elements like <article> or <section>.
Entity Definition55/100
Result: weak. 2 of 4 tests passed.
The brand 'Ombud' is consistent, but there is no dedicated 'About' page or Person schema for leadership.
Technical Accessibility80/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Meta descriptions and social tags are present and well-written. Content is accessible, though AI-specific crawler instructions are missing.
How ombud.com can improve its AI visibility
- Add Structured Data (JSON-LD) (high priority)
- Define Author Entities (high priority)
- Improve Semantic Hierarchy (medium priority)
- Add Authoritative Citations (medium priority)
- Optimize AI Crawler Access (low priority)
How ombud.com compares to its competitors
- Loopio (loopio.com) — score 78/100
- Responsive (formerly RFPIO) (rfpio.com) — score 84/100
- Highspot (highspot.com) — score 73/100
- Seismic (seismic.com) — score 51/100
- Qwilr (qwilr.com) — score 40/100