AI search visibility report ยท 2026-06-13
How AI assistants see supabase.com
supabase.com has an AI visibility score of 56/100. The site passed 17 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Schema.org Markup. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Authority & Trust Signals.
How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read supabase.com
Readability40/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
Technical content results in a low Flesch-Kincaid score and very long average sentence lengths, which may hinder LLM parsing.
Schema.org Markup80/100
Result: strong. 4 of 5 tests passed.
Excellent implementation of core JSON-LD (Organization, WebSite), but lacks specific content-level schemas like Product or FAQ.
Authority & Trust Signals40/100
Result: weak. 2 of 5 tests passed.
Strong trust signals through social proof and legal pages, but lacks specific author credentials and publication dates on the homepage.
Citation & Source Quality48/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
Lacks authoritative outbound links and formal inline citations for factual claims.
Content Freshness15/100
Result: weak. 1 of 4 tests passed.
No visible publication or modification dates found, though update signals (versioning/changelog) are present.
Content Structure60/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Good use of H1 and paragraphs, but skipped heading levels and a lack of semantic section tags lower the score.
Entity Definition55/100
Result: weak. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Strong brand consistency and Organization schema, but lacks Person schema for authors/founders.
Technical Accessibility100/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Perfect scores for crawler access, JS independence, and social metadata.
How supabase.com can improve its AI visibility
- Implement Visible Temporal Signals (high priority)
- Expand Content-Specific Schema (high priority)
- Define Authorial Entities (medium priority)
- Optimize Heading Hierarchy and Semantic HTML (medium priority)
- Add Authoritative Outbound Citations (low priority)
How supabase.com compares to its competitors
- Firebase (firebase.google.com)
- Appwrite (appwrite.io) โ score 64/100
- Nhost (nhost.io) โ score 43/100
- Convex (convex.dev) โ score 46/100