AI search visibility report ยท 2026-06-13
How AI assistants see nhost.io
nhost.io has an AI visibility score of 43/100. The site passed 14 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Readability. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Schema.org Markup.
How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read nhost.io
Readability90/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Good reading ease and sentence length, ideal for a technical audience.
Schema.org Markup0/100
Result: weak. 0 of 5 tests passed.
Complete absence of JSON-LD structured data.
Authority & Trust Signals30/100
Result: weak. 1 of 5 tests passed.
Missing physical address and publication dates. Trust pages are limited to terms.
Citation & Source Quality22/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
No authoritative outbound links or inline citations for technical claims.
Content Freshness0/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
No visible or metadata-based publication or modification dates found.
Content Structure75/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent heading hierarchy and semantic HTML usage, though paragraph length is very short.
Entity Definition43/100
Result: weak. 2 of 4 tests passed.
About page exists, but lacks Organization schema and author identification.
Technical Accessibility95/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent AI crawler access and social metadata implementation.
How nhost.io can improve its AI visibility
- Add Structured Data (JSON-LD) (high priority)
- Enhance Contact Transparency (high priority)
- Expose Modification Dates (medium priority)
- Improve Outbound Citations (medium priority)
- Define Author Entities (low priority)
How nhost.io compares to its competitors
- Supabase (supabase.com) โ score 56/100
- Firebase (firebase.google.com)
- Appwrite (appwrite.io) โ score 64/100
- Hasura (hasura.io)