LLMaoLLMao

    AI search visibility report · 2026-06-07

    How AI assistants see ea.com

    ea.com has an AI visibility score of 56/100. The site passed 17 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Content Structure. The areas to improve are Citation & Source Quality and Readability.

    How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read ea.com

    Readability25/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    Extremely poor readability scores due to very long sentences and low Flesch-Kincaid ease.

    Schema.org Markup54/100

    Result: weak. 3 of 5 tests passed.

    Valid JSON-LD present, but uses incorrect schema types for a homepage and lacks completeness.

    Authority & Trust Signals48/100

    Result: weak. 1 of 5 tests passed.

    Strong publication info and trust pages, but lacks specific author credentials and social proof schema.

    Citation & Source Quality24/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    Lacks authoritative outbound links and inline citations for factual claims.

    Content Freshness75/100

    Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent freshness with content updated within 3 days of the analysis date.

    Content Structure78/100

    Result: average. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Good use of semantic HTML and organization, though heading hierarchy has minor skips.

    Entity Definition43/100

    Result: weak. 2 of 4 tests passed.

    Clear brand consistency and about page, but lacks author identification and term definitions.

    Technical Accessibility100/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Perfect scores for crawler access, JS independence, and social metadata.

    How ea.com can improve its AI visibility

    • Implement Core Brand Schemas (high priority)
    • Reduce Sentence Complexity (high priority)
    • Enhance Author/Executive Entities (medium priority)
    • Add Authoritative Outbound Citations (medium priority)
    • Normalize Heading Hierarchy (low priority)

    How ea.com compares to its competitors