AI search visibility report ยท 2026-06-07
How AI assistants see ubisoft.com
ubisoft.com has an AI visibility score of 36/100. The site passed 9 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Readability and Technical Accessibility. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Schema.org Markup.
How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read ubisoft.com
Readability65/100
Result: average. 2 of 4 tests passed.
Sentences are excessively long (38 words avg), hindering LLM processing efficiency.
Schema.org Markup0/100
Result: weak. 0 of 5 tests passed.
Completely absent JSON-LD markup.
Authority & Trust Signals30/100
Result: weak. 1 of 5 tests passed.
Lacks author credentials and structured publication info, though trust pages are present.
Citation & Source Quality48/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
Minimal external citations or primary source attribution.
Content Freshness0/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
No machine-readable publication or modification dates found in metadata.
Content Structure54/100
Result: weak. 2 of 4 tests passed.
Good semantic HTML usage but poor paragraph structure and skipped heading levels.
Entity Definition43/100
Result: weak. 2 of 4 tests passed.
Strong brand consistency but lacks structured author and entity definitions.
Technical Accessibility60/100
Result: average. 2 of 4 tests passed.
Good crawler access and JS independence, but meta tags are severely lacking.
How ubisoft.com can improve its AI visibility
- Implement Core JSON-LD Schema (high priority)
- Establish Author Entities (high priority)
- Optimize Meta Descriptions (medium priority)
- Repair Heading Hierarchy (medium priority)
- Add Social Meta Tags (low priority)
How ubisoft.com compares to its competitors
- Electronic Arts (EA) (ea.com) โ score 56/100
- Activision Blizzard (activisionblizzard.com)
- Take-Two Interactive (take2games.com) โ score 54/100
- Square Enix (square-enix.com) โ score 21/100