LLMaoLLMao

    AI search visibility report ยท 2026-06-07

    How AI assistants see ubisoft.com

    ubisoft.com has an AI visibility score of 36/100. The site passed 9 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Readability and Technical Accessibility. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Schema.org Markup.

    How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read ubisoft.com

    Readability65/100

    Result: average. 2 of 4 tests passed.

    Sentences are excessively long (38 words avg), hindering LLM processing efficiency.

    Schema.org Markup0/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 5 tests passed.

    Completely absent JSON-LD markup.

    Authority & Trust Signals30/100

    Result: weak. 1 of 5 tests passed.

    Lacks author credentials and structured publication info, though trust pages are present.

    Citation & Source Quality48/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    Minimal external citations or primary source attribution.

    Content Freshness0/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    No machine-readable publication or modification dates found in metadata.

    Content Structure54/100

    Result: weak. 2 of 4 tests passed.

    Good semantic HTML usage but poor paragraph structure and skipped heading levels.

    Entity Definition43/100

    Result: weak. 2 of 4 tests passed.

    Strong brand consistency but lacks structured author and entity definitions.

    Technical Accessibility60/100

    Result: average. 2 of 4 tests passed.

    Good crawler access and JS independence, but meta tags are severely lacking.

    How ubisoft.com can improve its AI visibility

    • Implement Core JSON-LD Schema (high priority)
    • Establish Author Entities (high priority)
    • Optimize Meta Descriptions (medium priority)
    • Repair Heading Hierarchy (medium priority)
    • Add Social Meta Tags (low priority)

    How ubisoft.com compares to its competitors