AI search visibility report · 2026-10-26
How AI assistants see square-enix.com
square-enix.com has an AI visibility score of 21/100. The site passed 6 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Readability and Entity Definition. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Authority & Trust Signals.
How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read square-enix.com
Readability70/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
The text is clear and sentences are short, though the content is primarily a list of links.
Schema.org Markup0/100
Result: weak. 0 of 5 tests passed.
No JSON-LD or microdata schemas are present on the page.
Authority & Trust Signals0/100
Result: weak. 0 of 5 tests passed.
The page lacks contact information, trust pages, and publication dates. Author credentials are not defined.
Citation & Source Quality12/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
Outbound links exist but do not point to authoritative third-party sources like government or educational sites. No inline citations are present.
Content Freshness0/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
No publication or modification dates are present in the HTML or schema.
Content Structure16/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
The page lacks headings and paragraph elements. Semantic HTML is limited to header and footer.
Entity Definition40/100
Result: weak. 1 of 4 tests passed.
No dedicated about page or author identification. Entity consistency is maintained through brand naming.
Technical Accessibility40/100
Result: weak. 2 of 4 tests passed.
Robots.txt is well-configured for AI, but the page lacks meta descriptions and social meta tags.
How square-enix.com can improve its AI visibility
- Implement Core JSON-LD Schema (high priority)
- Add Meta Description (high priority)
- Establish Heading Hierarchy (high priority)
- Add Trust Pages to Footer (medium priority)
- Define Entity Relationships (medium priority)
How square-enix.com compares to its competitors
- Nintendo (nintendo.com) — score 52/100
- Capcom (capcom.com) — score 24/100
- Bandai Namco (bandainamco.com) — score 61/100
- Sega (sega.com) — score 39/100
- Ubisoft (ubisoft.com) — score 36/100