AI search visibility report ยท 2026-10-31
How AI assistants see thryv.com
thryv.com has an AI visibility score of 56/100. The site passed 19 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Citation & Source Quality. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Readability.
How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read thryv.com
Readability50/100
Result: weak. 2 of 4 tests passed.
Sentences are significantly too long for optimal LLM processing.
Schema.org Markup54/100
Result: weak. 3 of 5 tests passed.
JSON-LD is present but lacks core and content-specific schemas.
Authority & Trust Signals52/100
Result: weak. 2 of 5 tests passed.
Strong contact and trust pages, but lacks author credentials and publication dates.
Citation & Source Quality74/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Good use of inline citations for claims, but lacks links to high-authority external sources.
Content Freshness0/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
No visible or machine-readable dates found on the page.
Content Structure55/100
Result: weak. 2 of 4 tests passed.
Contains duplicate H1s and limited semantic HTML tags. Paragraph structure is good.
Entity Definition66/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
About page is present, but lacks Organization and Person schema to define entities.
Technical Accessibility95/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent crawler access and JS independence. Social meta tags are mostly complete.
How thryv.com can improve its AI visibility
- Implement Core Entity Schemas (high priority)
- Add Visible Publication and Update Dates (high priority)
- Fix Heading Hierarchy Errors (medium priority)
- Improve Sentence Readability (medium priority)
- Enhance Author Identification and Credentials (medium priority)
How thryv.com compares to its competitors
- HubSpot (hubspot.com) โ score 86/100
- Keap (keap.com)
- Podium (podium.com)
- Constant Contact (constantcontact.com) โ score 48/100