LLMaoLLMao

    AI search visibility report ยท 2026-10-31

    How AI assistants see thryv.com

    thryv.com has an AI visibility score of 56/100. The site passed 19 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Citation & Source Quality. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Readability.

    How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read thryv.com

    Readability50/100

    Result: weak. 2 of 4 tests passed.

    Sentences are significantly too long for optimal LLM processing.

    Schema.org Markup54/100

    Result: weak. 3 of 5 tests passed.

    JSON-LD is present but lacks core and content-specific schemas.

    Authority & Trust Signals52/100

    Result: weak. 2 of 5 tests passed.

    Strong contact and trust pages, but lacks author credentials and publication dates.

    Citation & Source Quality74/100

    Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    Good use of inline citations for claims, but lacks links to high-authority external sources.

    Content Freshness0/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    No visible or machine-readable dates found on the page.

    Content Structure55/100

    Result: weak. 2 of 4 tests passed.

    Contains duplicate H1s and limited semantic HTML tags. Paragraph structure is good.

    Entity Definition66/100

    Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    About page is present, but lacks Organization and Person schema to define entities.

    Technical Accessibility95/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent crawler access and JS independence. Social meta tags are mostly complete.

    How thryv.com can improve its AI visibility

    • Implement Core Entity Schemas (high priority)
    • Add Visible Publication and Update Dates (high priority)
    • Fix Heading Hierarchy Errors (medium priority)
    • Improve Sentence Readability (medium priority)
    • Enhance Author Identification and Credentials (medium priority)

    How thryv.com compares to its competitors