AI search visibility report · 2026-10-23
How AI assistants see constantcontact.com
constantcontact.com has an AI visibility score of 48/100. The site passed 13 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Citation & Source Quality. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Readability.
How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read constantcontact.com
Readability30/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
Sentences are too long and the reading ease score is very low for a general audience.
Schema.org Markup40/100
Result: weak. 2 of 5 tests passed.
JSON-LD is present but lacks core and content-specific schemas like Organization or Product.
Authority & Trust Signals38/100
Result: weak. 1 of 5 tests passed.
Contact info is strong, but the site lacks author credentials and comprehensive trust pages.
Citation & Source Quality69/100
Result: average. 2 of 4 tests passed.
Inline citations are present, but the site lacks links to high-authority external sources.
Content Freshness0/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
No publication or modification dates are visible or present in the metadata.
Content Structure66/100
Result: average. 2 of 4 tests passed.
Semantic HTML is excellent, but the heading hierarchy and paragraph structure are poor.
Entity Definition43/100
Result: weak. 2 of 4 tests passed.
The About page is present, but the site lacks author identification and term definitions.
Technical Accessibility100/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent technical setup for AI crawlers with full meta and social tag support.
How constantcontact.com can improve its AI visibility
- Implement Core Entity Schemas (high priority)
- Repair Heading Hierarchy (high priority)
- Define Author Entities with Schema (medium priority)
- Improve Content Readability (medium priority)
- Signal Content Freshness (medium priority)
How constantcontact.com compares to its competitors
- Mailchimp (mailchimp.com) — score 58/100
- HubSpot (hubspot.com) — score 86/100
- ActiveCampaign (activecampaign.com) — score 81/100
- Brevo (brevo.com) — score 61/100
- GetResponse (getresponse.com) — score 46/100