LLMaoLLMao

    AI search visibility report · 2026-10-23

    How AI assistants see activecampaign.com

    activecampaign.com has an AI visibility score of 81/100. The site passed 28 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Readability and Technical Accessibility. The areas to improve are Authority & Trust Signals and Schema.org Markup.

    How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read activecampaign.com

    Readability100/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Content is clear, well-paced, and maintains a professional reading level.

    Schema.org Markup68/100

    Result: average. 4 of 5 tests passed.

    Core technical schema is present, but missing critical content-specific schemas like Product or FAQ.

    Authority & Trust Signals60/100

    Result: average. 3 of 5 tests passed.

    Strong publication info and trust pages, but lacks machine-readable social proof and author credentials.

    Citation & Source Quality74/100

    Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    Claims are made but lack links to authoritative third-party sources for verification.

    Content Freshness75/100

    Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent recency with a current modified date, though explicit update logs are missing.

    Content Structure99/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Perfect heading hierarchy and strong semantic HTML usage.

    Entity Definition80/100

    Result: strong. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    Strong organization definition but lacks individual author identification.

    Technical Accessibility100/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent crawler access and social metadata implementation.

    How activecampaign.com can improve its AI visibility

    • Implement Product Schema (high priority)
    • Add Review Schema for Social Proof (high priority)
    • Cite Third-Party Data Sources (medium priority)
    • Define Author Entities (medium priority)
    • Add Visible Update Signals (low priority)

    How activecampaign.com compares to its competitors