AI search visibility report · 2026-10-23
How AI assistants see getresponse.com
getresponse.com has an AI visibility score of 46/100. The site passed 14 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Content Structure. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Schema.org Markup.
How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read getresponse.com
Readability30/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
The content is highly technical and uses very long sentences, making it difficult for automated tools to parse easily.
Schema.org Markup0/100
Result: weak. 0 of 5 tests passed.
No JSON-LD or microdata schemas were detected on the page.
Authority & Trust Signals38/100
Result: weak. 1 of 5 tests passed.
The site lacks structured author credentials and complete physical contact details, though it shows strong social proof through brand logos.
Citation & Source Quality74/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
The site uses inline citations well but lacks links to high-authority external domains like .gov or .edu sites.
Content Freshness0/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
No machine-readable publication or modification dates are present on the analyzed page.
Content Structure85/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent heading hierarchy and semantic HTML usage, though paragraph lengths are inconsistent.
Entity Definition48/100
Result: weak. 2 of 4 tests passed.
The brand entity is clear, but the lack of Organization schema limits machine-readable entity definition.
Technical Accessibility100/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent technical setup with full AI crawler access and strong social metadata.
How getresponse.com can improve its AI visibility
- Implement JSON-LD Schema Markup (high priority)
- Enhance Author Expertise Signals (high priority)
- Improve Content Readability Scores (medium priority)
- Complete Business Contact Information (medium priority)
- Expose Content Publication Dates (medium priority)
How getresponse.com compares to its competitors
- Mailchimp (mailchimp.com) — score 58/100
- Constant Contact (constantcontact.com) — score 48/100
- HubSpot (hubspot.com) — score 86/100
- ActiveCampaign (activecampaign.com) — score 81/100
- Brevo (brevo.com) — score 61/100