LLMaoLLMao

    AI search visibility report · 2026-10-08

    How AI assistants see spoonflower.com

    spoonflower.com has an AI visibility score of 49/100. The site passed 12 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Schema.org Markup. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Readability.

    How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read spoonflower.com

    Readability30/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    Sentence length is extremely high, leading to a very poor readability score.

    Schema.org Markup60/100

    Result: average. 3 of 5 tests passed.

    Valid JSON-LD is present, but it lacks core business and content-specific schemas.

    Authority & Trust Signals32/100

    Result: weak. 1 of 5 tests passed.

    The site lacks specific author credentials and publication dates, though it has basic trust pages.

    Citation & Source Quality57/100

    Result: weak. 1 of 4 tests passed.

    Good use of inline links, but lacks links to high-authority external references.

    Content Freshness0/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    No publication or modification dates are detectable in the markup or text.

    Content Structure52/100

    Result: weak. 1 of 4 tests passed.

    Poor heading hierarchy with excessive H1 tags and weak paragraph structure.

    Entity Definition58/100

    Result: weak. 2 of 4 tests passed.

    About page is present, but lacks structured data for the organization and authors.

    Technical Accessibility100/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent technical setup with full AI crawler access and strong social meta tags.

    How spoonflower.com can improve its AI visibility

    • Fix Heading Hierarchy (high priority)
    • Implement Author Schema (high priority)
    • Add Core Entity Schema (medium priority)
    • Surface Publication Dates (medium priority)
    • Improve Sentence Clarity (low priority)

    How spoonflower.com compares to its competitors