AI search visibility report ยท 2026-11-05
How AI assistants see creately.com
creately.com has an AI visibility score of 62/100. The site passed 19 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Content Structure. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Readability.
How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read creately.com
Readability30/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
Very low readability score due to extremely long, complex sentences.
Schema.org Markup74/100
Result: average. 4 of 5 tests passed.
Core schemas are valid, but specific content-level schemas (Product/Software) are missing.
Authority & Trust Signals46/100
Result: weak. 2 of 5 tests passed.
Trust pages and contact info are present, but lack of author credentials and publication dates lowers the score.
Citation & Source Quality74/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Inline citations are present, but links do not point to high-authority external domains.
Content Freshness0/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
No visible or machine-readable dates found on the page.
Content Structure90/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent use of semantic HTML and a perfect heading hierarchy.
Entity Definition70/100
Result: average. 2 of 4 tests passed.
Strong organization definition but lacks individual author identification.
Technical Accessibility93/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent crawler access and social meta tags. Meta description is slightly long.
How creately.com can improve its AI visibility
- Implement Visible Publication Dates (high priority)
- Define Author Entities with Schema (high priority)
- Simplify Sentence Structure (high priority)
- Add Product-Specific Schema (medium priority)
- Link to Authoritative External Sources (medium priority)
How creately.com compares to its competitors
- Lucidchart (lucidchart.com) โ score 48/100
- Miro (miro.com) โ score 43/100
- Microsoft Visio (visio.office.com) โ score 10/100
- draw.io (diagrams.net)