LLMaoLLMao

    AI search visibility report · 2026-10-08

    How AI assistants see miro.com

    miro.com has an AI visibility score of 43/100. The site passed 10 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Entity Definition. The areas to improve are Schema.org Markup and Content Freshness.

    How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read miro.com

    Readability30/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    Extremely low readability due to massive sentence lengths and jargon.

    Schema.org Markup0/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 5 tests passed.

    Complete absence of JSON-LD or microdata schemas.

    Authority & Trust Signals45/100

    Result: weak. 2 of 5 tests passed.

    Strong trust pages and contact info, but lacks publication dates and author credentials.

    Citation & Source Quality48/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    Lacks links to authoritative external sources and formal inline citations.

    Content Freshness15/100

    Result: weak. 1 of 4 tests passed.

    No visible dates or schema-based freshness signals despite update indicators.

    Content Structure52/100

    Result: weak. 1 of 4 tests passed.

    Semantic HTML is present, but heading hierarchy and paragraph structure are poor.

    Entity Definition58/100

    Result: weak. 2 of 4 tests passed.

    About page is present, but lacks schema and author identification.

    Technical Accessibility100/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent technical setup with full AI crawler access and social meta tags.

    How miro.com can improve its AI visibility

    • Add JSON-LD Schema Markup (high priority)
    • Fix Heading Hierarchy (high priority)
    • Improve Sentence Structure (high priority)
    • Include Publication Dates (medium priority)
    • Add Authoritative Citations (medium priority)

    How miro.com compares to its competitors