AI search visibility report · 2026-06-12
How AI assistants see aveva.com
aveva.com has an AI visibility score of 57/100. The site passed 19 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Schema.org Markup and Content Structure. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Readability.
How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read aveva.com
Readability38/100
Result: weak. 1 of 4 tests passed.
Technical jargon is present but expected; however, extremely long sentence structures hinder LLM readability scores.
Schema.org Markup80/100
Result: strong. 4 of 5 tests passed.
Core Organization and WebSite schemas are perfectly implemented, but content-specific schemas (Product/Service) are missing.
Authority & Trust Signals39/100
Result: weak. 2 of 5 tests passed.
Strong corporate trust pages and contact info, but lacks granular author credentials and schema-backed social proof.
Citation & Source Quality74/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Good use of internal and external links for claims, though lacks high-authority third-party citations (.gov/.edu).
Content Freshness0/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
While metadata shows a 2026 date, there are no visible dates or update signals for LLMs to verify recency.
Content Structure80/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent heading hierarchy and semantic HTML usage. Paragraph structure is functional but could be more concise.
Entity Definition55/100
Result: weak. 2 of 4 tests passed.
Strong brand consistency and About page, but lacks specific author/person entity definitions.
Technical Accessibility75/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent crawler access and JS independence, though social meta tags (Open Graph) are missing.
How aveva.com can improve its AI visibility
- Implement Visible Publication Dates (high priority)
- Expand Content-Specific Schema (high priority)
- Define Author Entities (medium priority)
- Optimize Sentence Structure for LLMs (medium priority)
- Add Schema-Backed Social Proof (medium priority)
How aveva.com compares to its competitors
- Siemens Digital Industries Software (siemens.com) — score 56/100
- Rockwell Automation (rockwellautomation.com) — score 46/100
- Bentley Systems (bentley.com) — score 68/100
- Honeywell Connected Plant (honeywell.com) — score 56/100
- Emerson Automation Solutions (emerson.com) — score 45/100