AI search visibility report · 2026-06-12
How AI assistants see bentley.com
bentley.com has an AI visibility score of 68/100. The site passed 21 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Content Freshness. The areas to improve are Readability and Entity Definition.
How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read bentley.com
Readability30/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
Extremely poor readability scores due to technical formatting issues and lack of sentence breaks in the main content area.
Schema.org Markup68/100
Result: average. 4 of 5 tests passed.
Core schemas are present and valid, but the site lacks content-specific schemas (Product, FAQ) that LLMs rely on.
Authority & Trust Signals70/100
Result: average. 3 of 5 tests passed.
Strong trust pages and contact info, but lacks schema-backed social proof and detailed author credentials.
Citation & Source Quality74/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Good use of inline links, but lacks citations to high-authority external primary sources (.gov, .edu).
Content Freshness75/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent recency and clear date metadata, though lacks a visible changelog or version history on the homepage.
Content Structure66/100
Result: average. 2 of 4 tests passed.
Semantic HTML is excellent, but heading hierarchy and paragraph structure are significantly broken.
Entity Definition65/100
Result: average. 2 of 4 tests passed.
Strong brand consistency and About page, but fails on author identification and person-entity linking.
Technical Accessibility100/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Perfect technical accessibility for AI crawlers with strong meta and social tags.
How bentley.com can improve its AI visibility
- Fix Heading Hierarchy and Multiple H1s (high priority)
- Improve Sentence-Level Readability (high priority)
- Add Content-Specific Schemas (Product/Software) (medium priority)
- Implement Author/Person Schema (medium priority)
- Incorporate Schema-Backed Social Proof (low priority)
How bentley.com compares to its competitors
- Autodesk (autodesk.com) — score 32/100
- Trimble (trimble.com) — score 41/100
- Hexagon AB (hexagon.com) — score 56/100
- AVEVA (aveva.com) — score 57/100