AI search visibility report · 2026-06-12
How AI assistants see hexagon.com
hexagon.com has an AI visibility score of 56/100. The site passed 17 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Schema.org Markup. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Authority & Trust Signals.
How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read hexagon.com
Readability35/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
Extremely poor readability scores due to excessive sentence length and high complexity.
Schema.org Markup80/100
Result: strong. 4 of 5 tests passed.
Core Organization and WebSite schemas are perfectly implemented, but content-level schema is missing.
Authority & Trust Signals34/100
Result: weak. 1 of 5 tests passed.
Strong social proof through brand logos, but lacks specific author credentials and detailed contact metadata.
Citation & Source Quality74/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Good use of inline links for verification, but lacks links to external authoritative third-party sources.
Content Freshness0/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
Critical failure: No machine-readable or visible dates found despite 2026 context in text.
Content Structure68/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent heading hierarchy, but lacks semantic sectioning and a table of contents for long-form content.
Entity Definition55/100
Result: weak. 2 of 4 tests passed.
Strong brand consistency and About page, but fails to define individual authors or key technical terms.
Technical Accessibility100/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent technical setup with full AI crawler access and strong social metadata.
How hexagon.com can improve its AI visibility
- Add Visible Publication Dates (high priority)
- Improve Sentence Structure for LLM Parsing (high priority)
- Implement Content-Specific Schema (medium priority)
- Define Author Entities with Schema (medium priority)
- Enhance Contact Transparency (low priority)
How hexagon.com compares to its competitors
- Trimble (trimble.com) — score 41/100
- Bentley Systems (bentley.com) — score 68/100
- Autodesk (autodesk.com) — score 32/100
- FARO Technologies (faro.com) — score 45/100