LLMaoLLMao

    AI search visibility report · 2026-06-05

    How AI assistants see autodesk.com

    autodesk.com has an AI visibility score of 32/100. The site passed 7 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Entity Definition. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Schema.org Markup.

    How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read autodesk.com

    Readability30/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    Extremely long sentences and low Flesch-Kincaid scores hinder LLM processing.

    Schema.org Markup0/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 5 tests passed.

    Complete absence of JSON-LD structured data.

    Authority & Trust Signals24/100

    Result: weak. 1 of 5 tests passed.

    Lacks structured author credentials and publication dates, though contact info and terms are present.

    Citation & Source Quality8/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    Very few outbound links and no formal inline citations for technical claims.

    Content Freshness0/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    No machine-readable or visible dates found on the homepage to indicate content recency.

    Content Structure49/100

    Result: weak. 1 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent heading hierarchy but poor semantic HTML usage and paragraph structure.

    Entity Definition53/100

    Result: weak. 2 of 4 tests passed.

    Strong brand consistency and About page, but lacks Person schema for authors.

    Technical Accessibility89/100

    Result: strong. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    Good crawler access and meta descriptions, but missing some social meta tags.

    How autodesk.com can improve its AI visibility

    • Implement Core JSON-LD Schema (high priority)
    • Add Temporal Metadata (high priority)
    • Establish Author Entities (medium priority)
    • Improve Semantic HTML Usage (medium priority)
    • Enhance External Citations (low priority)

    How autodesk.com compares to its competitors