AI search visibility report · 2026-06-11
How AI assistants see checkmarx.com
checkmarx.com has an AI visibility score of 70/100. The site passed 25 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Content Freshness. The areas to improve are Citation & Source Quality and Readability.
How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read checkmarx.com
Readability63/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Technical content is appropriately structured but has a low Flesch-Kincaid score, making it difficult for general audiences.
Schema.org Markup68/100
Result: average. 4 of 5 tests passed.
Core schemas are present and valid, but there is a total lack of content-specific schemas (Article, FAQ).
Authority & Trust Signals70/100
Result: average. 3 of 5 tests passed.
Strong trust signals via certifications and dates, but lacks detailed author credentials and full contact transparency.
Citation & Source Quality60/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Good use of internal and external links for claims, but lacks high-authority (.gov/.edu) citations.
Content Freshness75/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent recency with current 2026 dates, though lacks a formal changelog or version history.
Content Structure68/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Good use of semantic HTML, but the heading hierarchy is broken with multiple H1s and skipped levels.
Entity Definition65/100
Result: average. 2 of 4 tests passed.
Strong organization definition, but lacks individual author identification via schema.
Technical Accessibility100/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent technical setup with full AI crawler access and strong social metadata.
How checkmarx.com can improve its AI visibility
- Fix Heading Hierarchy and Multiple H1s (high priority)
- Add Content-Specific Schemas (high priority)
- Enhance Author/Leadership Entities (medium priority)
- Improve Outbound Citation Quality (medium priority)
- Complete Contact Information (medium priority)
How checkmarx.com compares to its competitors
- Snyk (snyk.io) — score 57/100
- Veracode (veracode.com) — score 69/100
- Synopsys (Black Duck) (synopsys.com) — score 32/100
- Wiz (wiz.io) — score 63/100