AI search visibility report · 2026-06-06
How AI assistants see veracode.com
veracode.com has an AI visibility score of 69/100. The site passed 23 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Entity Definition. The areas to improve are Citation & Source Quality and Readability.
How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read veracode.com
Readability50/100
Result: weak. 2 of 4 tests passed.
Highly technical content with a very low Flesch-Kincaid score, making it difficult for general LLM processing.
Schema.org Markup68/100
Result: average. 4 of 5 tests passed.
Core schemas are present and valid, but missing specific content-level schemas (Product/Article).
Authority & Trust Signals74/100
Result: average. 3 of 5 tests passed.
Strong trust signals with clear contact info and trust pages, but lacks structured social proof and author credentials.
Citation & Source Quality22/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
Significant lack of external authoritative citations or primary source attribution for factual claims.
Content Freshness75/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent recency with 2026 dates, though formal update signals like changelogs are missing.
Content Structure72/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Good use of semantic HTML and organization, but penalized for multiple H1 tags.
Entity Definition80/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Strong brand consistency and About page, but lacks structured author identification.
Technical Accessibility100/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Perfect technical setup for AI crawlers with full social meta and JS independence.
How veracode.com can improve its AI visibility
- Add Product/SoftwareApplication Schema (high priority)
- Resolve Multiple H1 Tags and Hierarchy (high priority)
- Implement Authoritative Citations (medium priority)
- Enhance Author Entity Definition (medium priority)
- Add Visible Update Signals (low priority)
How veracode.com compares to its competitors
- Snyk (snyk.io) — score 57/100
- Checkmarx (checkmarx.com) — score 70/100
- Synopsys (Black Duck) (synopsys.com) — score 32/100
- GitHub Advanced Security (github.com) — score 53/100