LLMaoLLMao

    AI search visibility report · 2026-10-31

    How AI assistants see scorpion.co

    scorpion.co has an AI visibility score of 58/100. The site passed 20 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Schema.org Markup. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Authority & Trust Signals.

    How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read scorpion.co

    Readability70/100

    Result: average. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Sentences are slightly long, and the reading ease is low for a general audience.

    Schema.org Markup74/100

    Result: average. 4 of 5 tests passed.

    Valid LocalBusiness schema exists, but content-specific schemas (Service, FAQ) are missing.

    Authority & Trust Signals40/100

    Result: weak. 1 of 5 tests passed.

    Basic contact info and privacy pages exist, but lack of author credentials and publication dates hurts trust.

    Citation & Source Quality72/100

    Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    Inline citations are present, but links do not point to high-authority external domains.

    Content Freshness0/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    No dates found in schema or visible text to verify content recency.

    Content Structure70/100

    Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    Good semantic HTML and paragraph structure, but the total absence of an H1 tag is a major flaw.

    Entity Definition48/100

    Result: weak. 2 of 4 tests passed.

    About page is present, but lack of Person schema for authors limits entity depth.

    Technical Accessibility89/100

    Result: strong. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent crawler access and JS independence, but social meta is incomplete.

    How scorpion.co can improve its AI visibility

    • Fix Heading Hierarchy (high priority)
    • Add Content-Specific Schema (high priority)
    • Identify Authors with Schema (medium priority)
    • Surface Publication Dates (medium priority)
    • Complete Social Metadata (low priority)

    How scorpion.co compares to its competitors