LLMaoLLMao

    AI search visibility report · 2026-06-04

    How AI assistants see dealnews.com

    dealnews.com has an AI visibility score of 56/100. The site passed 17 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Technical Accessibility and Schema.org Markup. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Readability.

    How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read dealnews.com

    Readability30/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    Extremely poor readability scores due to excessive sentence length and complex structure.

    Schema.org Markup80/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 5 tests passed.

    Excellent technical implementation of core Organization and SoftwareApplication schemas.

    Authority & Trust Signals32/100

    Result: weak. 2 of 5 tests passed.

    Strong contact and organization data, but lacks trust pages and visible author credentials.

    Citation & Source Quality74/100

    Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    Good use of inline links for verification, but lacks links to high-authority primary sources.

    Content Freshness0/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    Critical failure: No dates found in schema or visible text to indicate content recency.

    Content Structure69/100

    Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    Good semantic HTML usage, but failed heading hierarchy due to missing H1.

    Entity Definition65/100

    Result: average. 2 of 4 tests passed.

    Strong organization definition, but lacks individual author identification.

    Technical Accessibility85/100

    Result: strong. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent AI crawler access and social meta, but meta description is too short.

    How dealnews.com can improve its AI visibility

    • Add Temporal Metadata and Visible Dates (high priority)
    • Improve Sentence Structure and Readability (high priority)
    • Fix Heading Hierarchy (Missing H1) (high priority)
    • Establish Trust and Policy Pages (medium priority)
    • Expand Content-Specific Schema (medium priority)

    How dealnews.com compares to its competitors