AI search visibility report ยท 2026-10-17
How AI assistants see fidelity.com
fidelity.com has an AI visibility score of 54/100. The site passed 17 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Content Structure and Technical Accessibility. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Entity Definition.
How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read fidelity.com
Readability30/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
Extremely poor readability scores due to massive sentence lengths in the scraped content.
Schema.org Markup74/100
Result: average. 4 of 5 tests passed.
Core schemas are present and valid, but content-specific schemas are missing.
Authority & Trust Signals37/100
Result: weak. 2 of 5 tests passed.
Strong trust pages and contact info, but lacks author credentials and social proof schema.
Citation & Source Quality72/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Good use of inline citations, but lacks links to high-authority external primary sources.
Content Freshness0/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
Complete lack of visible or machine-readable dates for content recency.
Content Structure93/100
Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent semantic HTML and paragraph structure, though heading hierarchy has minor skips.
Entity Definition30/100
Result: weak. 1 of 4 tests passed.
Weak entity definition due to missing About page and author identification.
Technical Accessibility82/100
Result: strong. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Good crawler access and JS independence, but social meta tags are incomplete.
How fidelity.com can improve its AI visibility
- Implement Visible Publication Dates (high priority)
- Establish Clear Entity Definition (high priority)
- Reduce Sentence Length for Readability (high priority)
- Enhance Author Credentials with Schema (medium priority)
- Expand Content-Specific Schema Markup (medium priority)
How fidelity.com compares to its competitors
- Charles Schwab (schwab.com) โ score 68/100
- Vanguard (vanguard.com) โ score 41/100
- TD Ameritrade (tdameritrade.com)
- E*TRADE (e-trade.com)