LLMaoLLMao

    AI search visibility report · 2026-10-20

    How AI assistants see vanguard.com

    vanguard.com has an AI visibility score of 41/100. The site passed 13 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Readability and Citation & Source Quality. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Schema.org Markup.

    How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read vanguard.com

    Readability80/100

    Result: strong. 4 of 4 tests passed.

    Sentences are well-structured, but the reading ease score is slightly low for general audiences.

    Schema.org Markup0/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 5 tests passed.

    No JSON-LD or microdata found on the page.

    Authority & Trust Signals34/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 5 tests passed.

    Missing core trust pages and publication dates. Contact information is incomplete.

    Citation & Source Quality68/100

    Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    Good use of inline citations for performance claims, but lacks authoritative outbound links.

    Content Freshness0/100

    Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.

    No machine-readable or visible publication/modification dates found.

    Content Structure63/100

    Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.

    Multiple H1 tags and skipped heading levels hinder structural clarity.

    Entity Definition40/100

    Result: weak. 1 of 4 tests passed.

    Lacks an About page and author identification. Entity consistency is strong.

    Technical Accessibility60/100

    Result: average. 2 of 4 tests passed.

    Excellent crawler access and JS independence, but meta description is too short.

    How vanguard.com can improve its AI visibility

    • Implement Core JSON-LD Schema (high priority)
    • Establish Clear Entity Definition (high priority)
    • Repair Heading Hierarchy (medium priority)
    • Optimize Meta Description Length (medium priority)
    • Add Content Freshness Signals (medium priority)

    How vanguard.com compares to its competitors