AI search visibility report · 2026-06-04
How AI assistants see stacksocial.com
stacksocial.com has an AI visibility score of 51/100. The site passed 15 of 34 tests. Its strongest areas are Schema.org Markup and Content Structure. The areas to improve are Content Freshness and Readability.
How ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read stacksocial.com
Readability30/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
Extremely poor readability scores due to technical formatting and long sentence strings in the scraped text.
Schema.org Markup80/100
Result: strong. 4 of 5 tests passed.
Solid core schemas (Organization, WebSite) but missing critical Product and Offer schemas for an e-commerce site.
Authority & Trust Signals38/100
Result: weak. 2 of 5 tests passed.
Strong contact and trust pages, but lacks visible publication dates and structured social proof on the homepage.
Citation & Source Quality47/100
Result: weak. 1 of 4 tests passed.
Good use of inline links for navigation, but lacks citations to authoritative external data sources.
Content Freshness0/100
Result: weak. 0 of 4 tests passed.
Complete absence of date metadata or visible timestamps makes it difficult for LLMs to verify content recency.
Content Structure70/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Excellent heading hierarchy and semantic HTML usage, but paragraph structure is fragmented.
Entity Definition55/100
Result: weak. 2 of 4 tests passed.
Clear brand identity and about page, but lacks Person schema for authors or experts.
Technical Accessibility70/100
Result: average. 3 of 4 tests passed.
Good crawler access and JS independence, but missing essential social meta tags.
How stacksocial.com can improve its AI visibility
- Add Visible Publication Dates (high priority)
- Implement Review Schema (high priority)
- Add Product Schema to Deals (high priority)
- Improve Sentence Structure (medium priority)
- Implement Social Meta Tags (medium priority)
How stacksocial.com compares to its competitors
- AppSumo (appsumo.com) — score 75/100
- Groupon (groupon.com) — score 42/100
- DealNews (dealnews.com) — score 56/100
- Slickdeals (slickdeals.net) — score 42/100